But for the majority of you out there, who I imagine aren’t professional sound engineers, the work Rode have done should be seen as a bonus and should really help you get a great sound without much effort. The AKG has a flatter frequency response and so may be better if you are a bit more experienced and want to make decisions on the EQ yourself a bit more. 10-25-2011 #9. brooklyn9847. I suppose the main reason you are looking to buy a microphone is the sound right? RODE microphones are usually very bright. Rob has over 15 years experience of recording music at home. } id get an audio technica 2020.. you can get it for less than $100 and its great 10-25-2011 #10. AKG C214 features an integrated suspension that reduces mechanical noise and vibration. I, therefore, conclude this makes the AKGp220 a poor choice for podcasting and vlogging in my opinion. Rode NT-1a, Audio Technica AT4040, or AKG Perception 420 ? I have to say, for the price point this microphone sounds incredible on vocals. It came out sounding a little harsh and was very breathy. This was particularly evident when using a finger plucking technique. } The polar reponse graph is taken as if you are looking down on the microphone from above. table#t17 { All you get is a small pouch/ dust cover. AKG C214’s equivalent self-noise is actually quite low, only 13 dB-A, which is also certainly sufficient to deliver such a clear high-quality recording, but Rode NT1A is better in this aspect. If you are planning to use the microphone for podcasting, vlogging or other spoken word applications there are a few thing you will be looking for. Well if you want that accurate representation of your voice then the Rode nt1a sounds like what you put in front of it. AKG P220 Vs P420 Conclusion In general, AKG P420 is indeed the best choice here. However, if you think you don't border-collapse: collapse; The Rode nt1a is a sort of ‘off grey’, perhaps you would call it a rose gold. table#t17 thead tr { Technical Specs I thought they both sounded pretty darn good. Both models have a frequency response range of 20 Hz – 20 kHz, which means that they can basically capture similar frequencies. AKG C214 Vs Rode NT1A Conclusion All in all, AKG C214 makes a great way to go, especially if you can benefit from the pre-attenuation pad and bass-cut filter. Testing it whilst typing and talking for example the sound of the keyboard is minimal. } This polar pattern allows you to isolate the main audio source from background noise. width: 50%; I find the The AT4040 very good on acoustic guitar, especially when you mix it in with another mic since it really has it's own unique sound, but I don't think it's good on male vocals. Mit einem Preis von unter 200 Euro erhaltet ihr hier bereits das Komplettset, das fast alles liefert, um hochwertige … A color typical of many condenser microphones for some reason. It has a cardioid polar pattern, which means that it captures sounds the best from the front while attenuating … background: -moz-linear-gradient(top, #660000 0%, #8F0000 100%); The attenuator is able to lower the incoming signal levels by 20dB, effectively increasing the maximum input level tolerance of the mic. Feature The frame is black while the grille is light brown, almost golden. width: 50%; It still has the dip in the lowest frequencies and a small bump at the top of the spectrum but it is flat in between. All in all, AKG C214 makes a great way to go, especially if you can benefit from the pre-attenuation pad and bass-cut filter. Hi friend and Welcome! background: linear-gradient(to bottom, #660000 0%,#8F0000 100%); Let’s find out if that price is worth it. When testing the p220 I actually found it a little overwhelming in the higher frequencies for vocals. table#t17 tbody tr { Grab a snack, sit back and relax because, AKG P420 is also very versatile, able to perform in any AKG C214 is rather bulky to the sides, but also slightly lighter than Rode NT1A. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. I mentioned at the outset of this article, that the reason these microphones are often compared, is due to a similar price point. font-size: 1.0em; However, even taking that into account the Rode is still around $50 more expensive. AKG P420 vs Rode NT1. It may pick up things that you don’t want, so be aware of your studio setup. table#t17 thead tr th#t17.end { As an Amazon Associate the site earns from qualifying purchases. background: -moz-linear-gradient(top, #660000 0%, #8F0000 100%); link to Can You Use a Single Studio Monitor? table#t17 tfoot tr { Musician's HQ also participates in affiliate programs with Plugin Boutique. I set up MusiciansHQ to share all the tips I've picked up along the way to help as many people create music as possible. I have experience with the Rode NT1A. It is clear which side is the front with a robust metal grill and logo which look good and overall it looks very stylish. So I decided to buy both microphones and put them through a series of test over a series of months in the ultimate AKG p220 vs Rode nt1a showdown! I actually really wasn’t a fan of the AKG p220 for vocals at all. background: -webkit-gradient(linear, left top, left bottom, color-stop(0%,#660000), color-stop(100%,#8F0000)); Very handy when you want to record some particularly loud sounds such as a guitar amp. The second switch is a ‘bass-cut filter’ which is designed to eliminate low rumbling sounds. So I decided to buy both microphones and put them through a series of test over a series of months in the ultimate AKG p220 vs Rode nt1a showdown! Want create site? Not sure about anything else. background: -webkit-linear-gradient(top, #660000 0%,#8F0000 100%); The table below is a quick summary of the specs of both these microphones side by side. Your email address will not be published. The bass notes were not drowning out the higher notes and everything balanced nicely in the recording. Nevertheless, it can be held comfortably in one hand, or mounted properly on a stand. Whereas the Rode has some peaks and troughs in the graph, indicating they are trying to give a more ‘finished’ sound straight out the box without you needing to mess around with EQ. A sound that personally I am always after when recording acoustic guitar. You can see in the Rode polar response graph, the microphone is very directional picking up virtually no sound from the rear. Inside the microphone itself is a nice matt black and it has a good weight to it, it feels well made when you hold it. One cool thing about Rode NT1A is that it boasts an extremely ultra-low self-noise level, which is barely 5 dB (A). border-top: medium none;border-bottom: 1px solid #CCCCCC;border-left: 1px solid #CCCCCC; text-align: left; And once you factor in how affordable they are, these are well worth the money. The way that Rode have tried to tailor this mic to sound great straight out the box is actually the reason some people aren’t massive fans of it.